Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

paulselhi

Take A Break From Gi

46 posts in this topic

It seems, even with the "awesome" new abilitities if AR3, that many peolple get frustrated and feel let down when doing gi animation renders, especially with object animation.

With all the hype pushed out by the developers you could be forgiven for believeing that most animations have to be done with GI. Sadly most renders are no where near perfect when it comes to gi object animation ( I think GI animation in AR3 is very overated and all the mutiple pass farting around is a real pain) Vray is not bad and from what i have seen of FinalRender it is probably the best. But which ever way you go it seems that at a bare minimum you need a dual core and more likely a quad core to get half decent results in a decent time frame. And if you are really looking for top quality renders that an octo core is a must

But looking at many scenes that people have issues with i often think..does this really need gi ? Why is it that we have become so obsessed with doing every render with gi and often overlook the critical role lighting plays in a render

As a case study here is a render i did using no gi, just 3 lights, render time is under a minute a frame on a dual core 2.4 ghz

http://www.black-and-white-to-color.com/stuff/pills11.mov

I have given my first test settings here http://www.black-and-white-to-color.com/ip...?showtopic=2244 and will add any new renders

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good Paul. I've just got myself V-Ray but haven't had time to play too much with it.

Nigel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for non gi renders AR can be better that vray since it handles the ao very well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

using just lights was how animation from big production companies was done (and probably still do)

if you got your hands on a scene from 1 of the animation eg.. the movie "Ice Age"

youll probably find about 30 lights in each scene

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have AR or VRay etc, and my main interest is animation, so I'm looking to get frames out as fast as possible rather than chasing photo-realism.

I get decent results using the free MoGraph Skylight plugin, it's essentially an enhanced lightdome, similar to Lumen lite (Lumen lite crashes for me in 10.5 though).

Here's an example, it could do with a couple of extra fills to highlight the head of the snake, but I think the overall look of the lighting is reasonably pleasing to the eye.

I can render animations like this at about 1-2 minutes per frame at HDTV settings on my quad. And no flicker!

Cheers,

Brian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Paul but I disagree with just about every point you made in setting out this thread.

Your fundamental question seems to be "Why is it that we have become so obsessed with doing every render with gi... ?" which is a kind of daft question. It's simply a better way to render. All other things being equal, a GI render will always be better than a Ray Traced render. And I see no evidence that people are, én mass, just turning on GI and "overlooking the critical role lighting plays in a render". Check the threads here. People are still sweating blood over their lighting set ups and asking as many lighting questions as they ever have.

As for the render engines being nowhere near perfect for GI. I agree that AR3 might be a little overrated but I think the problem is more to do with expectation than over selling by MAXON. I think it's a symptom of the collective relief that they finally did something about the long standing short comings of AR2. C4D was never going to be taken seriously outside of our community until they fixed AR2.

Vray is better than "not bad". It does perfect flicker free Object GI with no problems. Here's an example of full GI Object Animation

http://web.mac.com/karl.lloyd/GI_Clip/GI_Clip.html

(That reminds me, I must update my digger thread!)

As for Final Render being the best. Well I've yet to see anything that amounts to more than those conveniently simple test kind of renders that all the manufacturers put out that never really tell you much about a render engine's potential when used 'under fire', so I think the jury's still out on FR.

If your point is about render times then I'm afraid it's simply a case of you don't get nothing for nothing. If you want better renders you have to put up with longer render times. This is more a case of unrealistic expectations from the hobbyist. Time and time again you'll read someone in a thread here saying something like "I'm simply not prepared to wait ten minutes a frame...". Well, you can forget decent renders for all but the most basic of subjects, then. Of course we all want to cut down our render times, even if we have render farms at our disposal, but extended render times are a fact of life if you're pushing the envelope. Having said that, this might be one area where the manufacturers are guilty of over selling. They are fond of terms like 'BLAZING FAST RENDERS!!!!!' You should always read the word 'fast' with a certain sense of relativity. If the rendering of a frame were to come down from eleven hours to, say, four and a half hours, in a relative sense, that would qualify as 'fast'. Still wouldn't be fast, though!

Cheers

Karl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lesia44 i think you need to go to the link that paulselhi posted then youll see the you can get as good quality with a light setup as you could get with Gi.

(it is easier to setup with Gi )

read the lighting tut

http://www.3dluvr.com/content/article/39/4

and this 1

http://www.3dluvr.com/carles/tut01en.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

conventional lighting is nowhere near extinct. I think that knowledge of the basics used in combination with GI can produce great results. Gi is a tool and enhancer if anything. I think yu have to look at all the lighting situations such as indoor also. Where a light dome isnt as helpful because it doesnt produce realistic bounce lighting. But with knowledge of good lighting principles such as carles piles and use of new tools such as AO some really great illustrations can be produced. In agreement with the title i would say yes give GI a rest and pic up a good lighting book. On a side note i am very happy with the new AR3 and GI engine. I work with a pretty decent archvis company and while some renders do take long to render they take also take a fraction of the time compared to AR2+R10. So in terms of productivity and efficiency AR is very favourable and affordable vs the "industry standard" VRAY. Goto my site to see samples of my work or to www.create3d.com for the archvis stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Karl..point taken..as usual i may well have been talking out my derriere. But i personally would love to get my lighting skills up several levels and then maybe use gi as a final touch

when i said vray was not bad i suppose i meant to say that the solution can be accurate but it involves very high settings and is not network render friendly, nor for that matter is AR3. Final render object animation is staright frorward to setup and i believe ( though i may be wrong) is network render friendly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey dataflow,

I have used that technique wih my "backyard Scene" works great and renders fast.

The BackYard

As said above. He is a master :)

Peace,

Rich_Art. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gi vs. normal lighting... well GI looks really nice and most of the times the basic setup is pretty easy/fast (sky,main light etc.) if you tweak the setings right rendertimes can be acceptable....

One thing I preffer when working with 'normal' lighting is the amazing control you have over everything... alittle shadow here alittle specular highligt there... it takes alot longer to setup right but in the end it is very rewarding... also I think when starting with 3D it is a good practise to work with norml lights and even try to simulate GI with 'normal' lights...

Greetz Dutch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.