-
Sticky
-
- 40 replies
- 1,330 views
-
- 52 replies
- 4,295 views
-
- 28 replies
- 2,253 views
-
- 45 replies
- 4,374 views
-
- 119 replies
- 41,173 views
-
-
Latest Topics
-
- 5 replies
- 60 views
-
- 3 replies
- 57 views
-
- 2 replies
- 62 views
-
- 4 replies
- 68 views
-
- 3 replies
- 58 views
-
- 2 replies
- 32 views
-
- 4 replies
- 50 views
-
- 2 replies
- 51 views
-
- 2 replies
- 100 views
-
- 7 replies
- 97 views
-
- 6 replies
- 85 views
-
- 2 replies
- 71 views
-
-
WIP's & Final Images
-
- 9 replies
- 240 views
-
- 3 replies
- 57 views
-
- 5 replies
- 92 views
-
- 6 replies
- 179 views
-
- 12 replies
- 378 views
-
- 33 replies
- 779 views
-
.thumb.jpg.0c2305e53f48e2f1f9840ad6817b35db.jpg)
-
Who's Online 7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 111 Guests (See full list)
-
Member Statistics
-
Blog Entries
-
Latest Post's
-
He does Animation for PBS Space Time? Wow, that's nice! I'm kind of jealous... -
Cerbera, Thank you SO much for getting the file to work! You saved the day because it is for my boy who works for the YouTube channel Space Time and it was on a deadline. Very kind of you! BigAl3D: I will try those changes you suggest and see if that makes it work as well as the Cerbera version. Dynamics sure can get frustrating. Thanks for your thoughts. DasFrodo: I will give that a try too. -
Thanks danijelk, I,ve already removed the glass and am using Iradiance Cache as Primary but changing secondery to Photon and making buckets bigger has reduced render time to nearly 6 minutes. Thanks -
Thanks for your help, that seems to have worked! The only part that does not work is the easing parameters, but this has not worked in the last few versions of cinema... They must have changed something at some point which broke it. -
Thanks. She was actually the subject of the Maya tutorial. Thank You. And yes wires will be coming. I do need to retop the head as the loops aren't actually as good as they could be right now. -
By digitvisions · Posted
Nice work, I like the style and textures. It's also a very current and important story subject. For critics we will need to see the wire frames. Good luck. -
Shouldn't increasing "Steps per Frame" and "Maximum Solver Iterations per Step" do basically the same? I mean, I'm sure your solution with collision boxes works as well but personally I'm not the biggest fan of those kind of "dirty" workaroundss if the solver can just simulate it correctly...
-
Next batch :) 62_Egg_and_Sperm(MG).c4d 63_Nested_and_traced(MG).c4d 65_Material_switch(XP).c4d 67_Random_text_to_word(MG).c4d 68_Radar(MG).c4d -
You sure you didn't change anything else because changing a single rendering setting can change render time by hours. What items did you delete? -
Looking really good. It remindes me of Vanellope from Wreck it Ralph.
-
OK, I have a few thoughts. First off, there are many missing textures, all the one that point to your Downloads folder on your PC. Anyway, I'm rendering on a very old 2008 Mac Pro with 28 GB RAM. I just hit render a single frame (1st frame) and it took around 13 min. A good 4-5 min. just to calculate, mainly SSS somewhere in your scene. Not sure where the SSS is and I would make sure you really need it. That could shave a lot of time. OK, if you need SSS, that's fine. I like the Physical renderer, and in many cases, it renders faster, but not in this case. I even simplified the settings to Fixed and 3 passes. Render time was down to 04:13 min. to render. I then switched to Standard render and Best setting. I also removed the Physical Sky object. This is slow to render and you can just use a Sky object with a texture map to get the stars. Total render time only 3:25 min., but they looked very similar, again the only the first frame. Again this is only a 2008 Mac Pro so if you have an i7 or Xeon, it would render very quickly. Hope this helps. -
The linear rangemapper in the video is incorrect IMHO - it's a bit more complex than that. Here's a math version - piston3.zip -
If the camera is not going to be panning over a huge area the disk object a segmentation can be made around where the texture won't be as visible. At this part a different un Tessellated texture could be put on it if the Tessellation is done in the texture or the geometry could be split into new geometry. If the camera is panning over a huge area something similar could be done, but have the disk move with the camera. The trick would be to have the disk use World Coordinates. I'm not sure if World Coordinates for a texture exist in C4D or Redshift. In Unreal Engine this kind of thing could be done. In C4D with Redshift I'm not sure. Edit: I had this idea that a camera map could be done on the disk so when the disk moved in the second senario the texture would stay static. This might be a good way to do it if the camera is panning a large distance over the surface.
-
-
Jobs & Buy/Sell
-
