Jump to content


marmalade

MAXON Prices - Give us your feedback!

Recommended Posts

Quite simply, they've driven me away with the pricing. I'm not upgrading anymore and I'm slowly drifting away from CGI as a way of making a living. And that's a shame as I really like it as an art form.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The different tiers are make little sense. As a now pretty new freelance motion designer/3D Generalist I pretty much need studio which should be a tier only set up for Studios. (Dynamics, Hair, Character tool are tools I use regularly)

 

I feel like Studio and Broadcast should have feature parity but Studio have access to 4k or some other "Studio" type restrictions like unlimited Team Rendering or some such.

 

Since I left my last job I'm getting by with Houdini Indie and Blender for personal projects and using whatever in house Cinema when I work on site.  I'm holding off till I get my next big work at home job that requires Cinema for my purchase but I'd rather not, especially as each year release features get less impressive (Where's updated UV tools?).

 

Feature for feature Blender leaves Cinema in the dust and it's a real shame that Cinema is industry standard in my field but I'm glad I'm not tied to Maya.

 

I was hoping for a good black Friday deal as well, still there could be Cyber Monday....

 

(EDIT: Phrasing)

Edited by Oakley
Phrasing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Oakley said:

I was hoping for a good black Friday deal as well, still there could be Cyber Monday....

 

If I remember correctly, there was a price drop and if I am not wrong, Studio was 1000$ cheaper!! And folk"s, please keep this topic civilized, no need for any kind of "bad" words here.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some great and detailed points made in this forum.  What I would like to lend my support for changing:

  1. Not being penalized for missing an upgrade.  Honestly, I believe this will generate more sales than it losses as people hate feeling locked in to anything.  Also, there have been many times where the majority of new features in a release don't benefit Studio users but I upgrade anyway because the cost NOT to upgrade is higher.....now that is feeling trapped!
  2. Special reduced pricing for hobbyists.  Limit the output resolution for hobbyist licenses to no more than 1280 x 720 and remove net render capabilities, but other than that keep all features intact.

A few new ideas:

  • A customer loyalty program of some sort.  If you have faithfully been a customer for X consecutive years and kept your MSA current each year, then your maintenance price in the X+1 year should be discounted.  You would need this incentive if you allowed people to miss upgrades without being penalized.
  • The temporary license fees are (IMHO) too high if they are geared towards those who have previous licenses, did not upgrade but need a new feature for a short period of time.    For example, the Studio three month short term license is $600...which is about equal to the $750 annual MSA price.  If you are one license behind but cannot afford the MSA for the next version, this option makes no sense - there are cheaper options with better benefits.   For those who are only 1 revision behind, that temporary license cost should be significantly reduced and viewed as a more affordable way to pay the MSA in installments (eg. $225 every 3 months - $900 total for the year - only $150 more than the MSA price).

All-in-all, I agree with all the comments made here.  MAXON pricing needs some work.

 

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

31 minutes ago, Igor said:

If I remember correctly, there was a price drop and if I am not wrong, Studio was 1000$ cheaper!! And folk"s, please keep this topic civilized, no need for any kind of "bad" words here.

 

Cheers

 

I think I saw ToolFarm had an offer for us US cousins but no such love for us here in the EU yet.

 

I did not see any use of bad words on my part, maybe some frosty opinions - I  did not intend to offend so apologies if I did. ( I have also edited my original post to be more concise on fact and less of my more colourful quips)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think allot comes down to where your from, your circumstances in life, and if your making regular money from it.  The other thing that hardly anyone mentions is time and money invested into training, and plugins.  Its not the easy choice to make to simply move on to other software once you spent years learning C4D with hundreds spent on plugins, not if you invested your time and money into learning the depths of the software.  

 

At the moment MAXON has the rental system as a short term licence, this makes sense if you are not sure if C4D fits your needs long term, yet gives you the time to learn it.  Up to 75% of the rental fee can be put against a perpetual licence, this to me seems like a nice option added to the perpetual offering a decent discount of up to 75% of them fees against a perpetual licence, but this is meant to be a short term licence, not a on going pay out.  I worked it out that 2 years of a Studio rental would be a good time to upgrade to a perpetual licence if given 75% of the rental fees towards a perpetual licence.

 

Assuming the position of someone who has invested their time and money into C4D and wish to remain with it and are in the position where they cant afford the on going MSA this is where things need change.  The penalty for missing a upgrade is to high because the upgrade price is too high.  The upgrade price is used as a offset against the MSA  which makes the MSA the only viable option which until this year was a reasonable price while still on the border line of some users budgets.  The higher this offset the more one feels  its more like a ultimatum than and feasible choice.  If one can not afford the MSA then there is no chance of getting back in when the upgrade costs are substantially more.   £858 for a single studio upgrade, otherwise costing £630 while getting cinivercity for free, thats a £228 penalty not counting the costs for cinivercity if you use it.

 

 The reward of producing  a good upgrade should  equals more sales, but the current system is making customers pay for upgrades on the basis of the finical ultimatum, not necessarily because the upgrades are offering all users at least something they want. This to me distinguishes the split between the hobbyist and the Commercial user, and the user like me somewhere in the middle where its just manageable, but tight.  For the hobbyist in particular every single feature added counts as there is no financial return, and if you happen to be a Studio user them features has better hold up for that  £630 upgrade.

 

As it stands C4D Studio stills offers the best balance for the ease of use department and features even for character artist that must have a perpetual option and as a central hub to add the render engine and plugins of their choice.  The price increase may not be much to some, but if there is nothing of significance in that upgrade it may become the tipping point where people say enough is enough.    Chaosgroup have pushed me out the boat for Vray with its rental system, this makes it even more difficult to contend with upgrading C4D more than ever, although its not Maxons fault but with the price increase to the MSA this year its making me rethink my plans altogether.

 

Dan

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 3D-Pangel said:
  1. Special reduced pricing for hobbyists.  Limit the output resolution for hobbyist licenses to no more than 1280 x 720 and remove net render capabilities, but other than that keep all features intact.

That would be a far too restrictive output resolution and not in tune with the times. Compare Houdini Indie, taken from their FAQ:

Quote

When rendering image sequences, you are restricted to 4096 x 4096 pixels. There are not restrictions for still images. The image sequence restrictions apply to Mantra and any third party renderers supported by Indie.

 

If MAXON is ever going to contemplate an 'Indie' version (which I highly doubt, because they don't seem to understand that market very well if at all, and they would collide head on with the combined walls of Blender and Houdini to overcome!) they will have to match that.

 

Just now, Rectro said:

I think allot comes down to where your from, your circumstances in life, and if your making regular money from it.  The other thing that hardly anyone mentions is time and money invested into training, and plugins.  Its not the easy choice to make to simply move on to other software once you spent years learning C4D with hundreds spent on plugins, not if you invested your time and money into learning the depths of the software. 

I agree. It hated having to give up Cinema4D at the time, and moving to other software (Lightwave back then), just because as a freelancer with a limited number of 3d related jobs I couldn't afford MAXON's upkeep anymore. The transition to Lightwave was very, very painful for me, even though many other Lightwave users insist(ed) that it is easy to learn and use, my experience was a very different one. Mind, I was familiar with Lightwave since Amiga times... But Lightwave never clicked with me the same way C4D and Blender did, or even Houdini.

 

MAXON instilled a certain feeling of animosity in me at the time when they got rid of the possibility to upgrade from a lower version to the newest at the time, because I had expected to return to C4D at some point. With Lightwave languishing, and the frustrating Modeler<->Layout separation, and destructive modeling made me try out Blender 2.4 series, as well as a short stint with Modo. While Blender was crude compared to C4D at the time, its workflow clicked with me, and I never looked back. Houdini Indie makes for a nice combo with it.

 

I recall MAXON's free .v5 releases, which generated a LOT of goodwill with C4D users. MAXON got rid of those, of course. I still think up till this day that that is a mistake. Looking back this last decade, I now realize that leaving Cinema4D, while painful, proved to be the best course of action for myself personally (and in no uncertain terms financially!!!).  As a designer, 3d is only a small part of my work, and as a 3d hobbyist Blender plus Houdini is a great alternative (with free ProRender access and free updates when released! :wackywink:)

 

Aside from the high costs of upkeep, I feel C4d's current line-up makes no sense any longer. They really need to look into that. But that's been discussed before. Anyway, times are a-changing, and MAXON better keep up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Fastbee said:

If you really are a hobbiest with C4D making no money with it you will pirate it.

I don't accept that. There are plenty of us hobbyists paying for our 3D software as we can afford it. What I spend on my 3D hobby is peanuts compared to my cycling hobby.

 

Studio is way over priced in my opinion. It wouldn't be so bad if you didn't have to supplement it with X-Particles and some other UV editing and 3D painting software.

 

At the end of the day people should vote with their wallets and use / pay for whatever suits them. For me this is currently Modo but I'm tinkering with Blender as some things it does really well and of course it's free. It's certainly well worth keeping an eye on over the next few years.

 

Nigel / 3DKiwi

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

 

As Igor said I am reading this topic and other forums.   Not much to add at this point but my goal is to get as many people as possible to have the ability to use MAXON's products.  It is my favorite 3D tool and I want all to have the opportunity to enjoy it.

 

Cheers

Dave

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, 3DKiwi said:

I don't accept that. There are plenty of us hobbyists paying for our 3D software as we can afford it. What I spend on my 3D hobby is peanuts compared to my cycling hobby.

 

Studio is way over priced in my opinion. It wouldn't be so bad if you didn't have to supplement it with X-Particles and some other UV editing and 3D painting software.

 

At the end of the day people should vote with their wallets and use / pay for whatever suits them. For me this is currently Modo but I'm tinkering with Blender as some things it does really well and of course it's free. It's certainly well worth keeping an eye on over the next few years.

 

Nigel / 3DKiwi

I'm also a hobbyist who didn't pirate the software. I really like C4D, but agree with you about the price. I'm not sure how long I'll be able to afford the upgrades. Bottom line

1. Don't penalize people for missing an upgrade. For goodness sake, be glad they're coming back!

2. Reduce the prices for hobbyists. I make nothing on anything I've produced. Usually, because it isn't that good. Lol. But those that make less than 50 or 100k would really appreciate the break too.

3. Please don't do away with the perpetual license. I never upgraded Photoshop since they went to a subscription, even though a friend boasts how wonderful it is. I won't even buy Houdini at 200+ a year because its subscription based.

 

Thanks for listening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, 3DKiwi said:

I don't accept that. There are plenty of us hobbyists paying for our 3D software as we can afford it. What I spend on my 3D hobby is peanuts compared to my cycling hobby.

You are one of the fortunate.  At least in America there are a great deal of people in poverty that can't even afford luxuries like food and rent.  They will have a computer though, as it's needed for everything now a days, even getting a job.  There are also those that are going to a school, but don't have enough money even for the educational licence.  In America students graduate with huge student debt averaging $37,172.  I don't blame them if they pirate the software instead of paying the educational c4d price.  They could also be too young to legally get a job.  The free educational licence seems like a step in the right direction.  I'm not sure the hoops they have to jump through to get it, but from what I can gather only very specific schools qualify.  Long story short there are a lot of people that could start to learn C4D if there was a completely free version of C4D like Houdini has.  Free and low cost versions of C4D could also significantly reduce the amount of piracy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Fastbee said:

You are one of the fortunate.  At least in America there are a great deal of people in poverty that can't even afford luxuries like food and rent.  They will have a computer though, as it's needed for everything now a days, even getting a job.  There are also those that are going to a school, but don't have enough money even for the educational licence.  In America students graduate with huge student debt averaging $37,172.  I don't blame them if they pirate the software instead of paying the educational c4d price.  They could also be too young to legally get a job.  The free educational licence seems like a step in the right direction.  I'm not sure the hoops they have to jump through to get it, but from what I can gather only very specific schools qualify.  Long story short there are a lot of people that could start to learn C4D if there was a completely free version of C4D like Houdini has.  Free and low cost versions of C4D could also significantly reduce the amount of piracy.

While I support the request for more affordable educational software licenses, I find nothing in your argument that justifies pirating software.  A starving person stealing a loaf of bread to survive is one thing, but C4D is a luxury.  Having it fulfills no basic minimum human need.  By itself, C4D  does not provide warmth, shelter or food.  It is a want, and not a need.  No one is "entitled" to it...plain and simple.   If they are stealing it, it is through greed and nothing more.  And don't give me the argument that they could use it to make money.  To be able to earn some income from it requires weeks if not years of  training, dedication, practice and skill.  You don't just steal it on Monday, open a business with it on Tuesday and start eating again on Wednesday.  Sorry, they are not stealing it to put food on the table. They just want it and as such I cannot justify any reason that makes its theft acceptable.

 

Now, I firmly believe that in all options for providing hobbyist or educational licenses, MAXON needs to generate some income.  I posted previously that hobbyist licenses should be resolution limited and there was push back.  Honestly, as a hobbyist, the most you should hope for is being able to render something that looks good on your PC's screen.  You do not need print or HD resolutions if you are a hobbyist.  If you want higher resolution, buy the full license.  Asking MAXON to offer the full package at a reduced price without reduced features is not a long term path to financial success for MAXON.   

 

...and believe it or not....I want MAXON to be financially successful.  I  want them to have enough cash to be here for the long term and hire top notch developers to continually grow the program.  Yes...I am a hobbyist and about 6 to 10 years from retirement.  C4D is going to be a big part of my retirement years so MAXON better be around for at least 40 more years until I am either too blind to see the monitor or too arthritic to hold the mouse!

 

if not, I am coming for you Dave....I am coming for you!!!! :lol:

 

Dave

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×