Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
TreeW

Size of Cloner objects based on offset

Recommended Posts

There are two approaches that I've tried to get this effect, but neither are working quite the way I want them to.

 

1.

I have a Cloner set to object mode and am using a spline as its reference object.  The Cloner object gives special parameters for splines.  I like that you can animate the offset parameter and create the effect of items moving along a queue.  I want to change the size of each clone based on the position in the queue.  So in my example file I would like all of the clones to get smaller as they are approaching the point, not to maintain their original deformation, but have it be relative to their position.   I would like to avoid positioning the volumes of falloffs in space because I would like to do this with more complex splines.

 

2. 

I am using a spline effector instead of putting a spline in the cloner set to object mode.  I still can't figure out how to get the deformation in size to change with the offset.

 

134384318_Annotation2020-01-26181601.thumb.png.cb208befb2e5d7b3ec7ce2539dccce05.png

^ So basically I want to keep the rings moving but make sure this distribution of sizes along the spline stays consistent.

 

I am using r19 so I can't do anything with fields.  Any help/ pointers would be really appreciated!

 

Thanks

 

 

example1.c4d example2.c4d

Share this post


Link to post

You could avoid the "position in space" issue by using an align to spline tag on said effector.

 

Deck

Share this post


Link to post
  • Topic Author
  • Thanks Deck.

     

    I'm not exactly sure how to do this the right way.  I've an attached an example using the align to spline tag and it is still behaving the same way.  I am especially baffled because the Step effector is placed after the the Spline effector in this example.

     

    Is there any way you could share a quick example?

    example3.c4d

    Share this post


    Link to post

    To be honest Im still a bit confused as to what your after and what the problem is. just having dinner at the mo 🙂

     

    Deck

     

     

     

    Share this post


    Link to post
  • Topic Author
  • @deck No worries!  Enjoy your din.  Did you get a chance to look at any of the c4d files I sent?  When I animate the cloned objects to move along the spline the step deformation also moves along with it.  I can create another example if you're still cofused.

    Share this post


    Link to post

    I think I know where you coming from / going.

     

    How about this simple approach with no effectors but using the cloner in blend mode, either with two objects one smaller than the other, or in this case Ive used 3 to blend it back again from a big torus to a small one.

     

    Deck

     

    example blend.c4d

    Share this post


    Link to post
  • Topic Author
  • Thanks @deck.  I hadn't thought about using blend mode.

     

    This is the distribution of sizes that I'm looking for throughout the timeline.

     

    90043353_Annotation2020-01-26205438.thumb.png.6f545e5a616cdf1afd587e42ab7f4255.png

     

    but when I press play in that example too, the distribution moves likes everything else I have created so far.

     

    273740867_Annotation2020-01-26205500.thumb.png.3bc43ad4aae6061401fdfd8ffca2ead1.png1515839915_Annotation2020-01-26205816.png.170a7dd79f18759f15814f45ef2730d0.png

     

    ^ not what i'm aiming for.  

    Share this post


    Link to post

    I also have r19 and no fields but I am finding that Falloff both in C4D and X Particles seems to give me the same functionality. Here is a version using Falloff and no Spline Effector. This concept has really saved me in X Particles.

    Falloff Instead Of Fields.c4d

    Share this post


    Link to post

    So you want it to behave like Teknows example and one of your earlier examples I think was similar, i.e. spline passing through falloff of an effector, but without the use of an effector ?

    Or am I missing a part of the picture

     

    Deck

    Share this post


    Link to post
  • Topic Author
  • Yes @teknow's example is what I was looking for.  Was hoping to find some way to take the data from the position in the queue, not in XYZ space but I think this will work out alright.

    Share this post


    Link to post

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Reply to this topic...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Sign in to follow this  

    • Recently Browsing   0 members

      No registered users viewing this page.

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...