Jump to content

Hey

please be considerate and disable AD blocker when you are on the C4D Cafe, because it helps us run this forum. We minimalized showing of the AD's all across the forums, so please, be so kind and at least help us by having AD blocker turned off. 



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

paulselhi

A Poor Ar3 Test Result

Recommended Posts

paulselhi    23
  • Topic Author
  • I have been testing an object animation GI with AR 3 and got very bad results. The precalc times were about 30 hours on mu dual core 2.4 Ghz and i stopped rendering the final at 72 hours

    There are big issues with TP and GI/Sky as well as problems with area and hard shadows. Here is the result i posted at cgtalk so anyone feeling brave can d/l the r11 scene

    OK i stopped the render after about 72 hours..blimey this WAS only a test !!

    http://www.black-and-white-to-color.com/stuff/blockar3.mov

    There is definately an issue with TP though it seems to be intermittent, perhaps only at the start of the emission ? however look at the later frames. This is also compounded by an issue with the sun shadows. It seems that , in this scene at least, the hard and area sun shadows are unstable. I have done a test with a variety of lights ( infinite spot etc) and it seems that the problem is not just sky, soft shadows are OK but sun in sky does not have soft shadows. Perhaps a scene scale issue ?

    The flicker on the floor is not due to bump as i have no bump !! so it must be an AA issue, however ncreasing the AA would lead to even more dire render times as would increasing the GI ( there are gi artifacts as well as shadow issues)

    Overall i was pretty dissapointed considering the crazy pre calc times..it is a poor test result !!

    Any way I am sure others could do better so here is the scene, note sub poly disp is off in the render options

    http://www.black-and-white-to-color.com/st...allingblock.rar

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Aid    0

    Hi

    I have found creating NEW files in R11 works fine if I use old files from R10.5 and try and render in R11 have a lot of problems lighting / material and longer on rendering times + more - just my observations

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    StCanas    17

    Shame about the render because it's a fine animation! Is it like Vray? Vray turns out splendid object animation, but you have to know how to find the sweet spot to get it to do so.

    Cheers

    Karl

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    dataflow    17

    i think it might be a bug with the shadow. (not gi or any thing else)

    i did a little playing around with your scene

    1)turned off gi

    2)lowered the AA to 1x1 both settings (except floor at 1x1 - 2x2)

    then just scrolled to about frame 498 just before the shadow comes back on in your mov (i scrolled i didn't play the frames)

    when i did that the shadow wasn't there

    i went to about frame 510 (thats after shadow came back and flickered in your mov)

    but the shadows still didn't come back

    i had to scroll back and forward a few time to get the shadows to show up again

    (all that was with no gi)

    but i noticed in your mov that the shadows disappeared straight after the freeze TP ended

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    paulselhi    23
  • Topic Author
  • I think the shadow issue may be the scene size, not sure but i am runnung a vray test ( brute force GI) it is much faster and a better render- the sce size is much larger, i am at fame 276 after 5 hours at a larger resolution 840 x 340

    When this finishes i will try brute force and a larger scene scale in r 11

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    paulselhi    23
  • Topic Author
  • So the guantlet is down..can anyone render this scene with GI and no flicker (ar3 claims to be flicker free) as well as acceptable shadows and a flicker free ground object. From all the hype AR3 should do this with ease

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    3DKiwi    316

    I gather there are issues with TP and GI. All to do with pre passes and the particles not being in the exact some position each time the pre pass is done. Possible solutions could be to render using QMC mode or Sky Sampler mode. The situation would be helped if TP particles could be baked.

    3DKiwi

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    paulselhi    23
  • Topic Author
  • I do not think it is a purely GI caching issue i think it is a shadow and particle geometry bug

    Go to frame 193 render with gi and note there is no shadow, switch gi off..still no shadow, switch the TP emitter off..still no shadow but then trurn off the particle geometry and the shadow appears

    So this is not a gi issue but a bug with, at least this scene. shadows and particle geometry in r11

    even if i switch off sky and add an infinite light it is the same- particle geometry is interfering with shadows

    even using a mograph cloner object for the particles interfers with the shadows

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    paulselhi    23
  • Topic Author
  • Here is a render using R10 showing that shadows work fine in R10. The render took 20 hours using stochiastic mode aka brute force ( 50 hours faster then R11 and it's object animation mode and much better)

    I think the GI is quite good, still got some texture crawl on the floor and it seems that this is more obvious when you are looking across the floor at eye level, from above the crawl is not so obvious. I will try with higher AA

    If MAXON ever get around to looking at the hard shadows issue with R11 i would like to see how fast BF is with R11

    http://www.black-and-white-to-color.com/stuff/r10sto.mov

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    3D-Pangel    185

    Paul,

    Have you submitted your scene to MAXON tech support? This is all very disturbing news. If it was a pure TP and AR3 integration issue, I could live with that. But as it relates to particle geometry being on or off and appears with MoGraph as well as TP, it seems like something is fundementally wrong.

    Please keep us posted as this is critical to my upgrade decision (which is now on hold).

    3D-Pangel

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    paulselhi    23
  • Topic Author
  • ok i will pass it on to MAXON. Note it seems that if you bake the tp with a mograph cloner then the shadows work but 1. you should not HAVE to have MG to get TP to work and 2, i am not that keen on waiting all that time for a MG cache of several hundred frames with all the memory overhead it has

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.

    • Recently Browsing   0 members

      No registered users viewing this page.

    ×