Jump to content


All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Ah, you're not going quite South enough to see me - London is closest at around 60 miles from where I am in the Hampshire hills... I suspect you'll like the Scottish bits most of all - they are in some very attractive countryside up there once you get out of the towns.... CBR
  3. Ah okay, thanks for the information. The problem when I select layers of the OpenEXR with ExtractoR is that the layer selected gets really dark. When ExtractoR is disabled, it looks like the C4D render. I did 32bit renders (and changed the AE project to 32 bpc) but I also have the same problem. Also holy heck, 90mb/frame in 32bpc, I'm not sure that's a good idea for my RAM and hard drive :/ Not sure if this will help but here's what I had in mind : I'm really fond of the shiny reflective look you can get with the Luminance art shader, but you can't really have uv textures with it. I just found out that using a greyscale art shader and compositing it with full color/luminant textures allow me to get the look I want. I don't really need to knock out the background on this project but I'd like to make more complex animations later where I'd need that. So I'm trying to see how that can be done with a nice and clean multi-pass render.
  4. Thanks for the information on your experiences attempting this set up - really helpful to know it can be achieved! If it helps this is the set up I am using: Wacom Intuos Pro Apple Keyboard - connected via USB to - Aten CS782DP KVM Switch https://www.aten.com/au/en/products/kvm/desktop-kvm-switches/cs782dp/ - connected via USB / display port to - Mac Pro / PC & single 4K display (Both computers are running the latest Wacom drivers). Any further ideas would be really helpful. Thanks!
  5. Hello, Is there a way to convert the stereo camera rig to two separate ordinary c4d cameras. In other words, to break the rig once you've set it up the way you want the left and right eyes to behave, by essentially "making it editable." I am trying to work around the fact that the RedShift camera tag currently does not support the C4D stereo rig. Any tips would be appreciated. Thank you.
  6. Today
  7. So I'm trying to create a simple rig where I have an object following the rotation of 2 parent objects but it stays up right the entire time. I though I was on the right track using the constraint tag (Up Vector and Parent) but it's not working. Anyone know what I could be doing wrong or an easier way to do this? Thanks!
  8. I love a good fight! At dinner with a good wine! :-) ... I'm visiting London, Edinburgh, Inverness, Glasgow, Liverpool, Cardiff and back to Portugal, via Barcelona. A car trip with my family. ... Arizona! Well, that is not in my plans... but if you say so, I'll think about it. California is on my head... but your place it's on human kind's imaginary. Cowboys, movies and lots of land to speed up a chevy. :-) ... I'm on my City... South Portugal. Nice, friendly and calm.
  9. This time of year beats Christmas. The anticipation...and then the opening of shiny presents.
  10. And bigger is always better I suppose ? (for some reason) :) CBR
  11. You Brits and your tiny little island. "Which little bit is he headed for!?" JMarco should move to a real country like the U.S. My humble state of Arizona is twice as big as your stinking little island. A man needs some elbow room! :-) ;-)
  12. Nobody that knows can tell you, so I can shut that sort of question down straight away :) But not long to wait now... CBR
  13. Has anyone heard what we might expect from R21? Only a couple weeks away from SIGGRAPH.
  14. I think I'll start there with something I can follow in terms of its relevance to current C4D indeed. Thanks Cerbera! Definitely know a lot more now than when I started the thread :)
  15. I use Win machine and macbook on single display via Aten KVM switch, together with Wacom Intuos, works fine :) Even wireless keyboard is recognised in Aten switch! Was in same situation and did a thorough research to make sure I use a switch that works properly...
  16. I can only comment on my experience. I use a Connectpro UD-14+ KVM. The switches take a few second for it to re-recognize the tablet but it works with my Wacom...I just made sure each machine has the drivers installed.
  17. Hi there, Slightly strange request for information here - ultimately C4D related though! I am currently running C4D on both a Mac & PC, via one display / keyboard / mouse via a KVM switch (benefitting from the ability to seamlessly switch between the two machines via the same display & render on the GPU on the Windows machine. Ideally I would like to operate both the PC & the Mac via this KVM switch and use my Wacom tablet as part of the setup (I’ve always used a Wacom & prefer the accuracy it allows me) - however neither machine can see the tablet when I run it through the switch. I was wondering if anyone else had any experience of trying something similar - or had any advice or suggestions on how to get both machines to recognise the tablet? Any help would be welcome, Thanks for your time. Tim
  18. No, we hate all foreigners, and usually attack them on sight. Only joking - you'll be fine - everyone is pretty chilled out really. Which bit of the UK are you heading for ? CBR
  19. Well, ... That was unseen by me... Where was that moments ago? ... You rock... ... Thanks CBR. ... PS: I'm going to UK in august... I hope those lands are nice and friendly. ... Keep up your excelent work. ... Cheers. João Marco
  20. Ohh I see, I think. So this is my understanding: So with the loft still active, we can't create a cap because because it is not an editable object. We make the loft object editable in its easiest form to divide, in this case 9 subdivisions (but really 8) segments, which can be easily eyeballed with the knife tool to make into 4 slices, and we get that quality control back once we apply a subdivision surface. Yes. By converting the loft object hierarchy to an editable polygon to it's simplest form, we also make our file size smaller, and the subdivision surface is really only adding complexity (my poor choice of words) during render time. Ordinarily yes, but actually no with a Loft, because if that is still parametric, then there are no polys at all being stored, just splines, which are lighter than polys in file size at least... Subdivison surfaces wants only quads when subdividing. Yes, but that is not to say it won't deal with tris or ngons, just that you will have no control over HOW it deals with them, so best to avoid altogether. By having the inner bevel (image 3), we allow for a border of sorts around the edges so they aren't going in two different directions (image 2) which is better. I'm a little unsure the reasons for this. The reasons for this are manifold and complicated and would take more time to explain than I have right now. I think I need to do more work on understanding basic concepts such as what edge flow is. After a quick google brought me right back to C4D Cafe, I'm considering starting this youtube playlist if it's still useful in C4D 7 years later: It is still useful, if you keep in mind that all the knife tools are different now, Hypernurbs is the legacy name for what is now an SDS object, and some shortcuts are different too in later versions. It won't tell you everything, and not much in the way of reasons why we do stuff, but it will show you a good overview of the basics. Also check out the modelling tutorials on the cafes own Youtube channel where the tools are more up to date, and we can't get a better teacher than our very own @Hrvoje... CBR
  21. Long time indeed :) But yay, now we have the file the answer is there staring right back at us in the emitter settings :) Guess which 2 sets of numbers should be the same, and aren't ! ;) Yep, it's the first 2 - you want that 10,000 in the renderer too... Don't forget to do the other emitter as well ! CBR
  22. Ohh I see, I think. So this is my understanding: So with the loft still active, we can't create a cap because because it is not an editable object. We make the loft object editable in its easiest form to divide, in this case 9 subdivisions (but really 8) segments, which can be easily eyeballed with the knife tool to make into 4 slices, and we get that quality control back once we apply a subdivision surface. By converting the loft object hierarchy to an editable polygon to it's simpliest form, we also make our file size smaller, and the subdivision surface is really only adding complexity (my poor choice of words) during render time. Subdivison surfaces wants only quads when subdividing. By having the inner bevel (image 3), we allow for a border of sorts around the edges so they aren't going in two different directions (image 2) which is better. I'm a little unsure the reasons for this. I think I need to do more work on understanding basic concepts such as what edge flow is. After a quick google brought me right back to C4D Cafe, I'm considering starting this youtube playlist if it's still useful in C4D 7 years later:
  23. I knew it! :-D ... Hello, @Cerbera. Long time! ... I'm sending that to you guys... I'm working on a i7 2600k with a RX 580. Nothing fancy! No plugins or External Renders. Only Physical and Standart C4D Render engine. Both with similar output on this project. ... Thanks, CBR. ... João Marco
  24. Come on JM, you must know by now we haven't got much chance of diagnosing this without the scene file, and knowing what the general setup is... :) CBR
  25. Hello, Render-Men! ... I've a problem... that maybe is not, I hope. ... When I render in the VPort I can see all my work. When to Picture Viewer, the same file, I can see only a fraction of it. I'm sending two images so you can help out! ... Thanks in advance. ... João Marco
  26. The difference lies in how easy it is to cut the ends up into quads. By using the minimum segments necessary in the loft we assure ourselves that will be easy as it can be, and also retain ultimate polygonal efficiency - ie more of the subdivision is calculated at render time and isn't baked into the file adding to its size... But shouldn't let that alone decide what segmentation is done where. We should think about what additional details might need to be modelled into this later and let that principally decide what we keep in our base mesh. In this case I am assuming zero additional detail, so the minimum of 8 is fine. Yes, the first one is bad because it is a ngon, which SDS will subdivide seemingly at random, and almost never the correct way. It's edge flow is anyone's guess. The second one is better because at least we have now all quads, which is what SDS wants. But its edge flow is still going across the object in 2 directions. We can change / redirect the edge flow AROUND the object by doing the 3rd pic with the Inner extrude, so now the edge flow is circular on the outside, and therefore neatly isolated from the topology down the object. It also gives us a control loop on both sides of the rim, which will give a considerably more evenly tight ending than 1 alone. That makes sense ? Have a look at the edges going round the object as it goes down the length - that is still too many segments there. Aim for squares if you can, which is what SDS works best of all with... CBR
  1. Load more activity

YOUTUBE CHANNEL:

ABOUT US:

C4D Cafe is the largest CINEMA 4D community. We provide facilities for discussion, showcasing and learning our favorite software :) Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and much more. If you need to find solution to your problem or otherwise ask for help, Cafe is the right place.
×
×
  • Create New...