Jump to content


Regular Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

114 Great

1 Follower

About grain

  • Rank
    Cafe Senior

Profile Information

  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Location

Hardware | Software Information

  • C4D
    18.057 Studio
  • OS
  • GPU

Recent Profile Visitors

5,166 profile views
  1. Ha first thing that pops up is that it's only Win 10 compatible.. should have checked the fine print before upgrading the MSA.
  2. Hi everyone, we are looking for up to date reels and contact details for any London based C4D freelancers, for work in the next month. Experience using Octane render a plus. Please give us a shout at info@lightfield.studio. Cheers
  3. If you're just starting out, and not confident in your own modelling skills, then charging top dollar straight away is not a good plan. That estimate I gave you would be on the very low end of what a modeller could charge, but keeping in mind people in different markets can charge different amounts. For example, in the states, day rates are way higher than the UK and Europe. However, living costs are higher with expensive healthcare etc so it's justified. In your case, charge what you feel comfortable with, but most importantly be clear about what you can and can't do from the star
  4. Charge by the hour that way if they make a lot of changes you get paid for them. Agree on the rate up front (say, 30 euros an hour? figure out what you want per day and divide it by 8), and every time she sends you a new sketch or some feedback let her know how long you have a) spent on it and b) think these new changes will take. As far as working in black goes, make sure that's OK with her as well as some businesses will need to account for where they spend cash, so it doesn't look like they're spending hundreds of euros on < N O T H I N G > which looks super dodgy.
  5. Fabric engine is much more like ICE from XSI (now bifrost in maya) or a programming language than just a material system.
  6. Try exporting your lightning out as an Alembic and then re-importing it. It's a bit of a hassle but often works with cache errors like this.
  7. Looking more into the fields stuff, and .. wow it's pretty great. I highly recommend the aixsponza intro videos by Manuel, that guy is a boffin and his entagma Houdini tutorials are amazing. https://www.aixsponza.com/projects/chroma
  8. I do a lot of mograph stuff so the fields effects are interesting. Multi instance seems great, hope it is easy to inegrate into 3rd party renderers. The VDB stuff looks nice. Xparticles has had this for awhile (and houdini forever)so I'll be interested to see how the native C4D implementation compares. Seems weird to rely on it for actual modelling though, as poly meshes generated via VDB are always pretty gross even if they are all quads. Not sure but I think meshfusion in Modo is more advanced than this as it still keeps hard edges and flow (Kiwi, is that right? ha).
  9. Yes there's different modes, and you can also create layered scans where you just move the camera and repeat the process. It's also got the ability to output the scanned points as particles, mograph clones.. lots of creative options.
  10. LAZpoint - it's amazing, and renders blindingly fast. I recently worked on a job where it was used extensively.. http://lightfield.studio/clapat_sqr_portfolio/adnoc-panorama-launch-film/
  11. It's probably the prepping of the mesh, octane has to convert all the geo into poly meshes before sending the data to the GPU. When you're rendering a still, it may already have the data prepped because it's visible in the IPR. The more scene data you have the slower octane is frame by frame, however lately they've optimised it so it tries to only resend data that changes over time.
  12. Wow that's both really sad but amazing he's made it public. I hope he's OK. I was a registered effex user up until v2.5, it's got some quirks but is very powerful in certain ways. Definitely recommend anyone who doesn't have Xparticles or Houdini giving it a try - the mesher in particular is great.
  13. I've used houdini a bit, definitely not an expert, but I would say it's the perfect companion to C4D rather than a replacement for it. The two co-exist beautifully. Houdini engine makes it even easier to get them working together, but I often just use Alembic to go from one to the other. IMO nothing beats Cinema for speed when doing look dev, motion graphics, concept and design work. Houdini allows you to make procedural .. anything, basically. But sometimes you don't need that level of control, you just need to put some simple objects in, nice textures, and smash out something quickly.
  14. I've mucked about with this, and yes it does work really well - Here's a test scene file to play with, it's not the one that created that video but it's enough to get you started. Run the simulation in T4D first. RS_volume_test.c4d
  • Create New...