Jump to content

hvanderwegen

Regular Member
  • Content Count

    237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

hvanderwegen last won the day on December 14 2017

hvanderwegen had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

68 Noble Beginner

1 Follower

About hvanderwegen

  • Rank
    Cafe Ronin

Profile Information

  • First Name
    Herbert
  • Last Name
    van der Wegen
  • C4D Version
    12 (or older)
  • Location
    Vancouver

Recent Profile Visitors

1,953 profile views
  1. Rendering technology has moved forward, while C4D's standard renderer remained stuck in the past. Which is the reason of course why MAXON had to either develop their own new render engine, or choose an alternative existing solution. Hence ProRender, which is actually quite nice in its latest release, but unavailable to C4D users as of yet. And requires a good GPU to make the best use of. And (almost) real-time rendering is now available through the use of Unreal Engine or Eevee in Blender. What is scary and eye-opening is that Eevee produces the same quality (or better) as C4D's Standard or most traditional ray tracers at almost real-time rendering times. I teach in computer labs with iMacs, and Eevee looks quite beautiful, and renders ridiculous fast. Of course, the rendering tech behind Eevee excludes its use in a number of render scenarios. For animation it is 'da bomb', because it renders blazingly fast. And at this point one realizes that the older rendering tech like C4D's standard no longer is a valid proposition in many scenarios. (And switching between Cycles and Eevee is as good as seamless without the need for material changes, unlike Standard <--> ProRender in C4d!) And in those cases when Unreal or Eevee don't cut it, GPU accelerated rendering provides a proven solution. Cycles, ProRender, LuxCoreRender, etc. all have their respective use cases, however. Glass and caustics look absolutely stunning in a renderer such as LuxCoreRender (caustics is a problem for most modern render engines). And still render with very acceptable render times. Anyway, Eevee makes 3d (rendering) tremendous fun, in my opinion. Try it out on your iMac. (Yes, I realize Eevee is Blender based, but export your C4D scene as Collada, and import it in 2.8, and start playing with Eevee). And I would not be surprised if MAXON integrates Redshift in C4D at some point to keep its built-in rendering relevant, and remove Standard.
  2. Purchased, and installed Painter 2019. The last time I used Painter is about 12 years ago. My impressions: laggy, slow canvas panning and zooming (zooming slows down to the point of myself unable to bear it), bad anti-aliasing when zoomed out with thin inked lines, pretty terrible GUI and usability design - compared to Krita and ClipStudio Paint. But the worst is the drawing feel, which just feels very off to me. In Krita and ClipStudio the apps keep with me, and the overall feeling is just great and fluid. In Painter 2019 even simple brushes the entire drawing experience and feel is just not that nice. It seems Painter 2020 improves on the GUI and overall brush engine speed, but who would update and spend hundreds of dollars on an update based on Painter 2019 and compared to other digital painting apps which offer a much nicer GUI experience as well as smooth drawing/painting feel? And still no 16bit and 32bit image modes? Worse, inking with a thin pen on a zoomed out A4 canvas at 300 ppi and 1200 ppi results in wonky lines. An old issue that still plagues Painter 2019 on Windows (other apps like Krita, ClipStudio Paint, and the latest Photoshop versions fixed this). An interesting flashback to the past. A shame, because the brush engine features options still missing in most/many other ditigal painting apps, but the usability and drawing experience ruins it all for me.
  3. Ah sorry - in that case RAM is fine. Just get a good graphics card. Do research, though: depending on your work you may want to invest in a graphics card that allows you to do GPU rendering (like Cycles4D or Octane). Make sure your mainboard supports your choice of graphics card.
  4. PS No driver exists for the HD2000 that supports a higher version of OpenGL. I know, because I looked. I have a Windows tablet with the same chip, and desperately wanted to run some software which required OpenGL 4. It's a dead end. Luckily, you have a desktop that can be upgraded. And according to C4D's minimum system requirements your system lacks RAM memory as well: at least 4GB is required, and you only have 2GB. Check the system requirements here: https://www.MAXON.net/en/products/cinema-4d/system-requirements/
  5. That confirms it: only OpenGL 3.2 is supported on your HD2000 graphics chip. That's the culprit. Again, you have been very lucky R20 ran at all on your system.
  6. I think you might be out of luck with your Intel HD2000: it only supports OpenGL up to version 3.1 Cinema4D 21 requires at least OpenGL 4.1. While C4D R20 also required OpenGL 4.0, the latest R21 might not be as forgiving. In short: you lucked out. Your HD2000 is not officially supported in R20. The HD2000 is nine years old, and truly a bottom of the barrel graphics chip. I am amazed you have been able to do any 3d work on a system like that. My suggestion would be to invest a little money in a new graphics card. Your system is a XPS 8300 Desktop model, and looking at the technical service manual, it doesn't provide that much space for a graphics card, so you should be careful what kind of card to get. Measure the available space before making a purchase. A good inexpensive model would be the AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB. It will make a world of a difference compared to your current graphics chip (which, frankly, is outdated junk - sorry ). Your system main board sports one PCI Express x16 card slot, in which the new graphics card should be inserted. Check the service manual here: https://data.technimax.cz/attach/artilky/xps-8300_service manual_en-us.pdf Chapter 7 explains the process. An additional advantage when installing a new dedicated GPU is that your current HD2000 chip gobbles up precious main RAM, which is then released to the OS (and C4D) to work with. Also, if your Operating system is still running on a traditional hard drive (seeing that your computer is from 2011 chances are that it is), do yourself a favour and get a nice solid state drive (SSD), image your main hard drive, and clone your system on that new SSD drive. Finally, install a bit more memory, and it will feel like a new computer. Anyway, looking at your current system spec, you've been extraordinarily lucky Cinema4D R20 runs on it.
  7. That is easily resolved: select a vertex, hit the delete key, navigate to the Vertices entry, and right-mouse click that entry. Then assign your own custom shortcut key. I assigned backspace myself to quickly delete vertices.
  8. As I explained :-) The only exception seems to be a collection: those can be deleted directly in the outliner with the delete key.
  9. https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Source/Nodes/ParticleSystemNodes https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Source/Nodes It will take a while until all parts are implemented. How long exactly? No-one knows for certain. The developer behind the original animation nodes addon is now working for the Blender Foundation, so it is coming, and will be implemented part by part in the upcoming year. Also, test builds for animation nodes are already available for Blender 2.8. Particles are supported as well. So it is possible to get cracking with it now. It's a lot of fun. https://prenninger.com/3d/
  10. You'll be happy to know that a brilliant little addon was just released, which implements a "standard" bezier drawing tool in Blender. I very much like it, because it simplifies curve creation. https://blender-addons.org/flexi-bezier-tool/ That's strange: I can delete stuff in the viewport by hitting the delete key on my keyboard. No need for the X key. Perhaps you work on a Mac with a keyboard without a numeric key block which lacks the delete key located above the cursor keys? In that case I would change the Delete actions to use the backspace key instead. A minor inconvenience, and I would just invest in a proper extended keyboard (since the numeric keypad is truly helpful when navigating the viewport and certain other operations such as isolating objects or focusing the viewport on the selected object(s)). It is true the delete key doesn't work that way in the outliner (although for collections it does, so hopefully they will remedy this inconsistent behaviour soon). It is however possible to select objects in the outliner, and then move the mouse into the viewport area, and use the delete key - a bit faster and less mouse movements compared to the right-mouse clicking method. Yup, Cinema4D sports the nicest text tool of all 3d apps, I agree. (Small) improvements are on the way, though. Combined with splines (for the bevel) quite nice results are achievable with the text tool in Blender. And Blender's text tool includes some features not seen in other software. But it is in need of some improvements, just as Maya and Max got. My main issue is the underlying generated geometry, which is difficult to work (deform) with. I find this addon quite useful to remedy this for the most part: https://blender-addons.org/boundary-aligned-remesh/
  11. I would also add here that the rate of development of new features and (free and commercial) addons is a big plus. Blender's development is seeing an incredible momentum forward from a huge community, and this is clearly visible in all areas. For example, Bone-Studio just released their own build with patches that will be included in the official version later, but can be used right now: - light group passes (!) - OpenVDB remesher non-destructive modifier including OpenVDB boolean operations - Metaball to mesh both meshes/vertices and particles which carry motion blur information. https://blender.community/c/graphicall/kdbbbc/ And around the corner is E-Cycles in the official releases, which will speed up Cycles rendering by a factor of 2 or more. The long-wanted bevel profile feature is about to be integrated for both the destructive bevel and non-destructive bevel modifier... But these are only the tip of the iceberg. The particle system is about to be modernized and replaced with a new far more powerful one - which will be integrated with the Everything Nodes project and physics so everything talks to everything else in Blender - Houdini style. Hair is also being updated to follow suit. The list goes on, and on, and on... It's quite overwhelming, actually, and difficult to keep track of all developments at the moment. Blender has traction, and it doesn't seem to be stopping anytime soon.
  12. Finally the outliner is receiving some much needed love. I love C4D's outliner, and really never touched Blender's outliner much, instead relying on other methods. The latest builds merge Nate Craddocks Google Summer of Code 2019 outliner improvements: - synched selection (FINALLY!) and drag selection rectangle without the need to hit the box selection key: - drag over triangles to twirl down and up multiple 'folders' instead of being forced to open them one by one: - industry-standard shift-selecting with arrow keys to multi-select lists of objects and drag and drop of multiple objects is now supported : - other helpful changes, such as the option to use the keyboard's cursor keys to navigate the outliner (up and down, and left and right to enter and collapse the scene hierarchy). Really happy to see these changes. I always miss C4D's outliner when working in Blender! I've been testing the latest builds, and the outliner is finally proving to be a real help in organizing and selecting scene elements instead of being a hindrance. Additional outliner improvements are in the pipeline. See https://developer.blender.org/T68338
  13. Intel's Open Image Denoise is part of the latest 2.81 alpha build.
  14. Now that 2.8 is released, work has begun on integrating new features from various developers for 2.81. Blender should get regular releases every three months, or so, from this point forward. Voxel Remesher!
  15. Open the wall in Blender, and perform the bevel there. It will not break the UV map. Up to a point, of course. Depends on the complexity, but I tested with your wall object, and it works fine. You may have to clean up some things, though.

Latest Topics

Latest Comments

×
×
  • Create New...