Jump to content

chrisjones

Regular Member
  • Content Count

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

chrisjones last won the day on February 25

chrisjones had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

9 Noble Beginner

About chrisjones

  • Rank
    Cafe Ronin

Profile Information

  • First Name
    Chris
  • Last Name
    Jones
  • Location
    London UK

Cinema 4D Information

  • C4D Version
    R20.026 Studio

Recent Profile Visitors

587 profile views
  1. I wasn't aware of that. As someone who has worked in design / advertising for nigh on 22 years, I recall the switch from Silicon Graphics to Macs, and the horror at these little toy machines being introduced to take the industry forward in place of the revered SGI's. So here we are 20 years later waiting for Apple to show us what's next... I only ever see custom PC's in niche areas of design, such as events where the 3d operative is making an exhibition stand visual in Max, but the interior visuals, and experiential items are done in Cinema. I have a couple of friends work at MPC and the Mill, and they've not seen a Mac for years, and use Maya / Houdini / Modo and Nuke and tailored pipelines. Generalising sure, but you get the idea. I guess the real impactful features from the last few versions – Volumes / Fields / and er, can't think of another – focus on super creative motion graphics and speed of iteration, and there's outstanding tutorials all over the internet showing how these can be utilised to create awesome work. But the real fundamentals of modelling, texturing, uv'ing for example, there's a conspicuous absence compared to similar for Blender. It seems Blender is almost at a feature set comparable to Cinema, all this for free, so there is a genuine appeal to Blender should MAXON continue to be expensive and quite niche, and especially if yet again they completely overlook the modelling and UV tools in future. For what it's worth, I have tried twice now to switch fully to Blender but I hate the UI and the approach to a lot of the modelling procedures – that management stack on the right is light years behind Cinema's arrangement, and things like the material manager is hideous compared to Cinema. I can use Cinema on autopilot for the most part.
  2. You have to join the dots to see what the future holds: MAXON buys Redshift Redshift assist in development of their product utilising the new Apple Metal API Apple are the dominant force in the design industry (not VFX) Cinema 4D is the go-to 3d software for designers (not VFX) So MAXON and Redshift know their product is gonna exist for a long time yet, especially as the performance of these will be a core feature in Apple hardware updates. Allowing small studios, freelancers and hobbyists the opportunity to use these products under license via subscription satisfies a certain demand but they know full well the bulk of their revenue will come from businesses tied to that Mac ecosystem. This is what makes Cinema and Blender actually so different, regardless of their operational similarities. Blender is being touted as a viable alternative to Maya. They don't even want to gain a strong presence in the design industry. Just my two-cents worth…
  3. MoI is rad! I'm currently modelling a watch, and did all of the base parts in MoI. It just gets you from a to b super quickly without having to get bogged down with pushing and pulling vertices. Also, it's widely known over at MoI that Cinema is great for honouring the .obj's from MoI so it's a great little pipeline.
  4. It's to appear like the subscription money is doing a good job of providing people with a healthy return on their investment.
  5. Hey @Freemorpheme for your questions I believe the best answer is Motionworks' Make It Look Great 11 if you haven't already come across this then I suggest you should. Toby Pitman explains the core principles of workflow planning, problem solving, topology etc – really essential. There's loads of youtubers that can show you how to model something, such as Arrimus 3D, Nikolaus Shautz (Nikomedia) and so on, but the MILG11 series actually explains how to do it.
  6. @natevplas I get your sentiment thanks! I've actually just been spending ages trying to use good practice to get models that ok, maybe not 'perfect' but I have learned that doing a cheap, sh*** boole-ridden model causes grief all the way down the line further on. I guess after all that modelling I just wanted to find a quick solution so I can get lighting, then rendering, and hopefuly crank out some nice renders for my folio. I'm definitely gonna do cerbera's method first and see how I get on – he's got a few examples of these kind of devices modeled and rendered in the same way so for me that makes him the go to guy for advice on this technique.
  7. @Cerbera great work! seems we have similar interests in things to create in 3d. I may well be asking your guidance again no doubt
  8. Yeah I have quite a few of this device and they are waaaaay too perfect to be anything but renders. I actually began making this because I'd seen a thing a while back Jon Dickinson of Motionworks had posted on his Twitter feed about how to do the jogwheel – the centre wheel that mimics a turntable – and just carried on from there. It's kind of like my practice model, where I attempt different methods. Here's a basic render of what I've created so far:
  9. Hey thanks Cerbera, really appreciate you taking the time to explain. Trust me I'm not one to ask first without trying. I did a few experiments, got fairly close with a layer shader in the colour channel but it got so convoluted it became difficult to tweak as it was all so intertwined. I knew it could be a simple process. I guess I should have persevered with the anisotropy in the first place!
  10. Hey all, Bit nooby this one – I wish to create the brushed effect shown on this surface using C4D native materials and Physical renderer. I've been spending so much time learning modelling, and wanted a few decent models first before moving on to texturing. The model has two plastic surfaces – the outside of the device has a fine diffuse black and the centre, around the jogwheel, has that kind of anisotropy surface. I have created a layer in photoshop using noise and motion blur, as you would if you wanted to create a brushed metal surface in photoshop. Do I use a luma shader? or put it in the reflection channel? how would you guys do it? I guess it's just a dark metal really?
  11. Mesh Boolean is really cool for multiple booleans on hard surface models. Kind of like the Volume Builder tool in the sense you can quickly build up complex models. Like any boolean, it's hideous on curved surfaces. The fact the objects within the heirarchy have tags that have variables is really cool.
  12. @Rectro Thanks sooooo much for taking the time to craft a well thought out response, I really appreciate that. I will check out your fan art walkthrough later to get a general overview of the approach you take. And it's cool that there's a very good Z Brush artist who's brain I can pick on here too! I wish to utilise the application on a few things I have coming up. You know that moment where you become aware of a particular application, and you haven't quite figured out yet how it will become a part of you armoury? I was exactly like this a number of years ago when I was wading through Andrew Kramer's After Effect tutorials on Video Copilot, and there were a number of tutorials that started to introduce the viewer to importing 3d objects, that then progressed onto a tutorial that actually made one to import. I had heard of Cinema 4D but hadn't the faintest idea exactly what it could be used for. And then I discovered Behance, and studied what people were making on there and after finally getting Cinema, and after a number of years, I get it. At the moment, with Z Brush, I know I will prefer to sculpt my surfaces, make maps of the surface to then use for my models. Right now I kind of don't quite get it, I'm just waiting for the penny to drop. Of the three – Cinema / Z Brush / Substance Painter – Z Brush is by far the least accessible in terms of UI and procedure. Like I mentioned, I am going to use Z Brush to define the leather portions of the ear cups on the headphones. I think something as straightforward as this – simple base model, really generic topology etc – shouldn't pose to omanuy problems and also it will give me a gentle introduction to making the mesh a tool in Z Brush, utilising the subtool principles etc, and exporting and re-importing into Cinema. Thanks once agin for your response, I'm sure I'll tap you up again in the future!
  13. Hey guys, Hope you are all well. Apologies if this is blasphemous on a Cinema forum, but do any of you guys use Z Brush? I am modelling a set of headphones, and I fancy trying to create the soft ear cup and headband parts in Cinema as basic models then use these simple shapes for my first foray into Z Brush, which I plan on getting on trial to do so. I've got a few tutorial vids etc but always helps to have real humans giving real world advice. Perhaps my main priority would be to have the genral gist of the workflow explained from an experience standpoint. I'm guessing I do whatever sculpting in Z Brush then import the mesh back into Cinema, but I don't know if I then just bake the normals and use those, or retopologise. Just a general noob question really! Thanks for your time Chris
  14. @zeden thanks for the recommendation. Have you used it at all?
  15. Thanks guys. I often discover little things that make me wonder if they are useful to assit with the modelling side of 3D, but I guess unless everybody is utilising these external tools then best to just persevere with Cinema's tools. For what it's worth, I have been plugging away for so long now at just modelling I actually feel I am getting somewhere at last. It takes so long, it's easy to desire a magic formula to make things easier. That said, I found I only got really schooled once I saw Make It Look Good 11 by Toby Pitman for Motionworks.

Latest Topics

Latest Comments

×
×
  • Create New...