Jump to content

Marander

TDMSC
  • Content Count

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Marander last won the day on November 28

Marander had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

11 Poor

Profile Information

  • First Name
    Michael
  • Last Name
    Meli
  • C4D Ver
    R20.026 Studio
  • Location
    Switzerland
  • Interests
    3D Design, Technology, SciFi, Sports

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Welcome, glad it helped you!
  2. This should work: import c4d from c4d import gui def main(): allobj = doc.GetActiveObjects(c4d.GETACTIVEOBJECTFLAGS_CHILDREN) obj = object() for obj in allobj: obj[c4d.ID_BASEOBJECT_VISIBILITY_EDITOR] = 1 obj[c4d.ID_BASEOBJECT_VISIBILITY_RENDER] = 1 if __name__=='__main__': main() c4d.EventAdd()
  3. Marander

    MAXON Prices - Give us your feedback!

    @Midphase Note, my observations of Houdini are from playing a bit with the Apprentice version only from time to time and what I read on the SideFX homepage. Yes, you have some valid points there and as I mentioned, I will eventually rent Houdini Indie for some time anyway, it's a great piece of software and the pricing is more than fair. And yes, I'm not saying C4D is cheap and I spent probably as much for render engines and plugins additionally, but hey, it's fun to use - and I can use it whenever and wherever I want. I think C4D will always be my primary 3D app. However what you didn't mention or consider is, that Houdini Indie comes with a few limitations (besides licensing) that you don't have with other "full" software. $100k revenue might not be an awful lot in some regions. It initially didn't support 3rd party render engines and only one machine installation but at least that is improved. About the file type conversion: They offer a one-time conversion upon request. There are render limitations but they are hardly an issue for most. Full price is $4.5k and annual upgrade price $2.5k(!). They already increased the yearly price (nevertheless still a great offer and for two years the price remains the same). From a capability point of view, yes it can do incredible stuff and is very flexible. I like its procedural concept and the possibility to write code everywhere. However I think few users can actually use its full potential and only using shelf tools isn't the real thing. On the other hand, C4D might provide faster results, a quicker workflow and better usability for most users. There are so many great and easy to use plugins that I don't want to miss. Yes I know you can create Houdini Assets but to recreate all the C4D plugins would take a long time.
  4. Marander

    MAXON Prices - Give us your feedback!

    One more thing towards MAXON: Please try to monitor stop the selling of pirated C4D versions in Ebay. There are ebay users making money of pirating C4D and selling them as official versions (they are mostly priced around $100-$500). I think there is currently no such offer but I have seen them offered and being sold regularly in ebay. WHY? There are people I know of that bought it and thought they have a genuine version (and some still do). Out of curiosity, due to the convincing product description and low price I once purchased a C4D 'license' from ebay - the seller claimed it is a legit version that he doesn't use anymore. I verified it with MAXON, of course it turned out to be a pirated serial number.
  5. Marander

    MAXON Prices - Give us your feedback!

    I disagree. You cannot compare Houdini pricing and licensing to C4D because Houdini (perpetual) is more expensive and node locked. You can not just install the software on a new machine when you need to, you will need to change the activation and as far as I know that's pretty restricted with SideFX Houdini. You cannot just open your projects again years later without paying again and maybe by then the older versions are not even available anymore. You cannot use your scenes created in Indie in the full versions. Next example MODO, a software that is available with perpetual perpetual license (I wonder for how much longer) but requires online activation that seems to cause problems for legit users (because the Foundry online activation system failed repeatedly) to an extend that users loose customers because they cannot deliver is worthless to me. Then AD, people complain that C4D is expensive the AD subscription fees are just crazy expensive for the fact that its only rental and will never be owned. Now Vray is subscription only, requiring the workstation to be online all the time (even to display material previews), what a BS. At least we C4D Vray users can keep and use the old version. I love the MAXON Cinema 4D and NewTek LightWave licensing models. I'm a hobbyist, not making money with 3D, just using it for fun and personal interest. I purchased C4D Broadcast + MSA and later upgraded to Studio + tons of plugins, and I'm so happy with it. There are way more expensive hobbies. Take photography for example, a good lens or SLR body costs as much or more then C4D Studio. Or you can buy a race bicycle for 10k. Or expensive musical instruments. Or oldtimer cars. There is no way I'm going to rent software / use subscription services for my main software. The day C4D comes as subscription only, node locked or requiring online activation of any kind, I'll stop upgrading. I will most likely rent Houdini Indie for 2 years out of interest but I will not make it my main software. I find it unfair of pirating commercial software towards the paying customers and the developers when all these free options are available. More shameful even are people who use a pirated software for commercial purpose and making money of it and I know there are many of them. Who doesn't have money he can always use Blender nowadays.
  6. Marander

    Volume Menu is gone

    No OpenVDB installation required, that just works within C4D R20 right out of the box. Did you maybe import a Layout from R19 or somehow share preferences with a previous version? What happens if you select Standard Layout in the Layout dropdown? I would uninstall, remove the C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\MAXON\Cinema 4D R20_xxxx folder and install again.
  7. Marander

    Cinema 4D R20 available NOW!

    Same here unfortunately... but I was told that you can contact MAXON DE directly to order the additional package with the USB key.
  8. Marander

    R20 About dialog easter egg

    R20 has a special About dialog (Help - About) - with a hommage to the 3 founders and the answer of all answers. The the graphic somehow resembles old TrueSpace renders :-)
  9. New Real-time Physics Simulation using Machine Learning. Vote for a C4D Plugin in the Download section! http://apagom.com/physicsforests/
  10. Marander

    why are there no C4D Cafe tutorials ?

    Yes and those commercial trainings from HSrdelic are highly recommendable, great content, quality and well worth the money!
  11. Marander

    CINEMA 4D R20 OVERVIEW

    With all respect, I wouldn't call the Physical renderer aging. It it's not the fastest one, but the quality is very high. And in R20 it got progressive speed improvements. I like using Physical, it's easy to achieve great results in various lighting situations. It was constantly updated in the past releases (Thin Film shader for example). Having it now extended with Nodes is amazing and the implementation seems rock solid from what was shown so far. Yes, it would have been nice to have it for ProRender already in R20 but look at the other massive work that has been done in a short amount of time. As I also have and (occasionally use) LW 2018 (and previous versions) and Cinema 4D R17-18 Broadcast / R19 Studio with Standard, Physical, Vray 3.6 and Cycles 4D, from my experience I'd say that those render engines are far ahead of LWs "new" render engine which is pretty slow, grainy and has several issues like fireflies in many lighting / material situations. I have to admit that I didn't spend much time with it yet, but the UI / workflow for good render settings is not intuitive. It also broke compatibility with several important 3rd party plugins that were never updated. Dropping the old engine (that allowed much more experimenting and tuning) was a mistake of NewTek in my opinion. Even tough it can render VDB volumes it's quite limited in its use. The shading is not great for conductor surfaces, while Physical and Vray produce outstanding results with few settings. C4D is in a completely different league than LW in every possible aspect. About Pro Render, yes it would have been nice to have Nodes already (and in XPresso) but 1) You can bake them 2) I have no doubt MAXON gets that right soon, 3) I guess most C4D users still use Standard / Physical renderer, 4) It's important to have a solid CPU render engine onboard and 5) There are great GPU engines available for C4D with nodal shading, so I don't see ProRender as a must have right now
  12. Marander

    CINEMA 4D R20 OVERVIEW

    I'm very happy with the release. With the new Nodal features, VDB, Fields, Cloner improvements and deep and easy Alembic integration I see a big foundation built for future feature implementations. These cornerstones are important and open many new possibilities. VDB can be used for fluid sim for example, the Cloner enhancement for other performance improvements like particles maybe, the Fields can be a basis for a new Particle System, the Node UI for nodal animation in XPresso2. Lots of great stuff to come I'm sure. To me, the Node Editor implementation is the most pleasing and smartest I have seen so far. And with Layers, the UberShader and Assets you get best of both worlds. Heck, MAXON built about 150 Material Nodes to begin with. The VDB Mesher seems to produce more pleasing results than the XP4 OpenVDBMesher and is more deeply integrated in C4Ds architecture. This is a huge modeling feature in my opinion, close to MeshFusion. I'm looking forward to see if the primitives and other modeling tools in the new core have any performance improvements. I would have loved to see XPresso2 with these Nodes and the Asset toolset but at least we should know about how awesome it could be in one of the next releases. MAXON already delivered great previous releases with features like Takes, Voronoi Fracture, Poly Reduction, Modeling Core, Knife tools, LOD, Viewport enhancements, new Media Core, Pro Render, SDK etc. so its understandable that not everything can be done at once. C4D's architecture is very solid and if MAXON does something, they do it right in my opinion. btw for UV Mapping I highly recommend Seamilar. I have modified it's dialog UV dialog box with all the relevant UV buttons and integrated it into a Layout that it works like a native tool. If that is not sufficient, there is 3D-Coat. For 3D Texturing, there is Substance Painter.
  13. Marander

    Isn't R20 Just Around The Corner?

    The good thing is C4D's perpetual, offline license compared to other applications Only LightWave and Cinema are left with complete offline, perpetual licensing systems. These are therefore the 3D applications of my choice. All other 3d applications are node locked, rental only or require online activation as far as I know. Even modo uses online activation now. I considered modo at some point but with the new online activation system I lost all remaining interest. Yes, I agree to a certain amount (incompatible app due to future OS changes) but the current Win64 / MacOS architecture will not just vanish all of a sudden, important applications will most likely still run on future MS operating systems and then there are other options like VMs (with some limitations). Cinebench based on R15 is still one of the most used benchmarks for new hardware and I guess very old Cinema versions still run on Win10.
  14. Marander

    Isn't R20 Just Around The Corner?

    Very sorry to hear that Dan, I wish you all the best and good recovery!
  15. Marander

    Isn't R20 Just Around The Corner?

    Very interesting thread, these tiny hints of the beta testers make me very excited for R20. What I'd love to see are - some modeling improvements based on the new modeling core like symmetry - Boolean re-write, less geometry errors with multiple booleans, so that plugins like MeshBoolean can work even better, - Retopo - better large scene / multiple object handling - viewport enhancements with OpenGL volumetrics - XPresso improvements (maybe involving nodal materials) No matter what, I know I'll love R20 because already today C4D is such a great and robust application.

×