Jump to content

rasputin

Regular Member
  • Content Count

    996
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by rasputin

  1. rasputin

    Rasputin Gallery II

    More of my more recent C4D renders.
  2. Wow... can you imagine a Compositor built into C4D ! That would be amazing... To do all your video work "in house", so to speak...
  3. Cerbera, am I the only one who's noticed that Align Normals almost NEVER works? On an extremely simple low-poly mesh, it might, but if the model is even slightly complex, Align Normals does not yield any appreciable effect at all. And my copy of Selections Suppletives gives me a menu... in POLISH! Which I can't make sense of at all, and I don't know how to change its language to English....
  4. Hey guys, You know what I would like to see in a future release of C4D? Better selection tools. It should be easier, I think, to make sophisticated selections of all kinds. Above all, I'd like to be able to, on a mesh object, select only Front-Facing Normals Polys... Or only the rear-facing normals. Also, the Phong Selection mode should be perhaps more effective... making it easier to select polys that fall along a slope. As the years have gone on, I find that my objects are often very high-poly... especially with the advent of the Volume Building features. With high poly objects, it's tedious and frustrating to make precise selections, especially if there is a jumble of Front- and Rear-facing polys in evidence. So, I say, I'd love to see R21 have some more advanced, clever and sophisticated Poly Selection tools. Thoughts? ras
  5. I'll prolly go in and tweak some edges to make that cushion look separate... usually with a finished VB model, I'll run it through the Polygon Reduction process.... You're right, some of the smooth perfection is lost that way, but not too much of a problem if the model is not sharply focal in a complex scene...
  6. Here's a 1950's Moderne-type sofa chassis I designed this afternoon. It was all done using the R20 Volume Builder. Basically a thick Torus primitive with various chunky shapes Subtracted from it. A shape like this would've been a nightmare to model using just the old tools, I think you'll agree. But it was not too hard to do with Volumes. I'm lovin' the buttery-smooth shapes you can make with the VB. I'll have the rest of this room scene built in the next couple of days and will show it to you when I do. ---ras
  7. Version 1.0.0

    9 downloads

    Corona Renderer 3 For C4D includes its own Skin Material shader, designed to simulate the look of human skin, but in its default state, it is not very convincing. I took that shader and gave its parameters many tweaks which I believe make the resulting "skin" much more convincing and expressive looking. This C4D project file includes my tweaked version of the Corona Skin Shader-- including three needed bitmaps--- along with this curvy "dummy" object seen in this screencap.
  8. A bit of a dumb n00B question: What exactly is an irradiance cache? And why would you want to cache any aspect of your GI solution? And what happens if you DON'T cache your GI solution? Thanks in advance, ras
  9. Hey guys, I'm curious as to what's causing this: I've got this image currently rendering in the Picture Viewer, using Standard Render with Global Illumination. As you can see, I'm getting some "fireflies" that aren't being smoothed out. I've never seen Standard Render produce fireflies before... Wonder what's causing it? How can I eliminate them (or get them smoothed out) in subsequent Standard renders? The gold and blue colors of the fireflies are probably related to the two Infinite Lights I've got stationed to the left of this scene, outside the walls of this "building": one is gold, the other blue. I just don't know why my interior textures here are picking up those lights with fireflies. Thoughts? Ideas? Thanks, ras
  10. Hey guys, I've set up a scene using Standard Render, to which I've added pronounced DOF post-effect, in both blur and in tint. All good and well. In the picture viewer, it rendered like this, which is what I want. Out of curiosity, I also rendered a Multipass Image, with all the available layers checked active, just so I could study them in Photoshop. To my surprise, the Multipass PSD Image-- with all its pertinent layers active in P'SHOP--- ended up looking like this. Not only considerably darker in appearance, but my DOF was nowhere to be found amongst the layers... neither the blur nor the color tint. QUESTIONS: Why did the Multipass PSD look much darker and over-saturated in P'SHOP, and where did my DOF go? Do none of the Multipass layers contain that DOF information? Thanks, ras
  11. Hey guys, This may seem like something of a n00B question, though I've been doing C4D for over a decade. It's like this: When you select a Cubic Projection mode for an object's texture, sometimes you are going to get visible seams, like the one you see in my screencap here. Question: What determines where those seams will appear on any given object? Can I hide/remove/disguise those seams.. and still keep my Cubic projection? I like the look of a Cubic Projection, it looks better than any of the other default Projection modes. Frontal projection will indeed give me a seamless look, but as we know, it risks looking unnatural inasmuch as the texture is distributed uniformly over the object, and changes in appearance with camera angle and focus distance. Thoughts? Hints? Tips? Thanks, ras
  12. What Cerbera said. This is a job for Marvelous Designer. Not only because of the restraining cords, but because the fabric in your picture buckles in a very attractive, natural way, that I'm not sure C4D Cloth can simulate.
  13. Hi gang, Would you believe, I've been doing C4D since 2003, and I still don't know what an "isoparm" is? I have created a spline-sweep object today, and one of the parameters is, of course, Isoparm Subdivision. Increasing or lowering that number seems to have no visible effect (that I can see, anyway) on my object's appearance. So what is the importance of Isoparm Subdivision? In what 3D situation would this parameter be of great importance? Thanks, ras
  14. Thanks, srek, very helpful. I am preparing to render a very complex scene, filled with many objects... I'm trying to pull out every trick in the book for making the render go faster.
  15. waitaminnit--- am i fundamentally misunderstanding the nature of LOD? Does it only apply to your model's polycount... not affecting the textures in any way?
  16. I'm curious: Am I right in thinking that C4D uses a kind of built-in LOD (Level of Detail) for objects rendered, depending on how close they are to the camera? For example, in an ultra close-up of an object, the C4D renderer will work hard to capture (and Antialias) every single nuance of your texture... Whereas, if that same object is far away, the renderer will not "work as hard"--- and go more quickly--- because it knows that the tiny details won't be perceptible anyway? Is it a good strategy for speeding up rendertime to assign different objects different LOD's? Like, if I don't want the renderer to "work too hard" on some objects in a scene? As it stands, I have a textured stucco wall in my scene (including some Normal and Displacement)... and the renderer is spending an eternity on it, capturing every tiny little nuance of the stucco... when it's the foreground objects I'm primarily interested in, not the wall. Thoughts? Hints? Ideas? Thanks, ras
  17. I'm wondering: Can R20 still do that old rendering method that used to be called "Camera Render"? This is where you lock the position of your scene's Camera, do a scene render, then, in subsequent renders it can simply apply an identical bitmapped "image" to some of your scene objects, sparing your computer's resources for really complex scenes? I used to use that approach sometimes, but it was a long time ago, with earlier C4D releases... Like, R8 or R10. To tell you the truth, I don't even remember how I used to set up that kind of render. Am I losing my mind, or did this feature once exist? Is this technique still do-able in R20? If not, when was this feature discontinued? Thanks, ras
  18. Hey gang, I'm trying to create a crumpled candy wrapper, as for the waxed-paper on unwrapped bubblegum. I want to get a realistic crumpled paper effect as seen in my attached (real-life) photograph here. How would YOU go about it? Thanks, ras
  19. Version 1.0.0

    11 downloads

    This package consists of a single high-res (2048 x 2048px) Displacement bitmap, a greyscale and perfectly seamless PNG file, whose purpose is to simulate the look of swirled buttercream frosting as seen on a cake, cupcake or pastry, or as the characteristic undulations seen on a chocolate-robed candy bar. No Noise algorithm or Procedural shader was giving me the effect I wanted, so I made this one. Simply load it into your texture's Displacement channel--- with the Diffuse and Reflection colors of your choice, suggesting a "flavor"--- and you will get the effect of a pastry frosting applied with a swirling motion. It is recommended to switch Subpolygon Displacement active: the thumbnail sample here uses a setting of 4. Adjust your UV settings to make the swirls broad or fine; adjust the Displacement settings to get a subtle or highly-raised effect. As it is greyscale, this bitmap could also conceivably be used as a mask, say, in your Reflection channel, or even used as an AO map.

YOUTUBE CHANNEL:

ABOUT US:

C4D Cafe is the largest CINEMA 4D community. We provide facilities for discussion, showcasing and learning our favorite software :) Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and much more. If you need to find solution to your problem or otherwise ask for help, Cafe is the right place.
×
×
  • Create New...